Nobuyuki TANAKA

As eras change, so too do the meanings, thoughts, and values associated with craftsmanship. In today’s world, where the internet and AI are rapidly transforming society, every field of expression is faced with fundamental questions: “What is the significance of making and expressing things by hand?” and “What is it that truly fulfills the heart?” In such a climate, the question of what one truly wishes to express through the medium of Urushi has become more vital than ever.

During the Final Assessment, I looked beyond mere technical prowess, the beauty of materials, or technical refinement. I focused on whether the work clearly conveyed the artist’s intent—why it was created and what it aimed to achieve. A work of art naturally reflects the creator’s philosophy, experience, and way of life. Even if the technique is superior, a piece fails to leave a lasting impression if it lacks a sense of necessity. Conversely, even where there is a degree of immaturity, a work can be deeply moving if it reveals a unique perspective or a spirit of challenge.

Urushi is a natural material that has been cherished in Asia since ancient times. I believe that tradition is not about repeating the past, but about inheriting the essence of its spirit and technique while creating expressions unique to a specific land and a new era. While I sensed an improvement in technical standards and an understanding of the material among this year’s entries, I also felt there is room to further deepen the connection between the artists’ inner necessity and the finished work.
As history demonstrates, Urushi possesses a power and a vast potential to captivate the human heart, regardless of the era. I sincerely hope that this exhibition will continue to flourish as a platform for sharing the renewed appeal of Urushi with the world and as a forum where diverse and daring challenges are born.

→ Back to Jurors’ Comments